🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.